| 1 |
On 01/18/2012 01:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 23 October 2011 09:50:04 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use |
| 5 |
>>> INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree. |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> Do you have any idea how much time me, and aballier spent to make |
| 8 |
>>> cdparanoia's build system as clean as it is now? And then to coordinate |
| 9 |
>>> them with upstream xiph.org? |
| 10 |
>>> Then I see this... Not acceptable by any standards. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> I'd like to get my standards up to speed, so may I respectfully ask- what |
| 13 |
>> is, apart from link time, the Gentoo-user-visible difference between |
| 14 |
>> * removing the .a files in the ebuild |
| 15 |
>> * and not building them in the first place? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> there is no post-emerge visible difference, but i wouldn't underestimate the |
| 18 |
> speed of things. for most packages, you're talking about compiling the files |
| 19 |
> twice (once as PIC and once as not). |
| 20 |
> -mike |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
[ ... grabbing random mail from this thread ... ] |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
i've already fixed cdparanoid properly. |
| 25 |
it was pretty much 2 liner, so whatever was committed before was simply |
| 26 |
out of laziness to investigate. |
Archives