| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 24/09/13 02:15 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:21:07PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Out of curiosity, what is the reasoning behind making these libs |
| 7 |
>> private? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Well, the thought has changed slightly. librc can't be made |
| 10 |
> private currently because of openrc-settingsd. libeinfo, on the |
| 11 |
> other hand, does not have any known consumers, so there is no |
| 12 |
> reason to keep it as a library. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That doesn't answer my question, though; yes at this point there's no |
| 15 |
reason to keep it public, but -why- move it to private? |
| 16 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 17 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlJB2EoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPC8uwD+PwSGgcRI1Yv4COVjfavrbt4p |
| 20 |
tag4I4xzueXBvBBeIygA/RPCV+xnK5SHwdGluxQxPUj0Zpg4EPeeJ/+F1gpWVPC7 |
| 21 |
=cEZR |
| 22 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives