1 |
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:37 +0700 |
2 |
"C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Long term the API to pkgcore could be beneficial, but |
5 |
> again I'm not sure it's a game changer for users. |
6 |
|
7 |
Long term, we should have an independent API backend that tools can |
8 |
query; not rewrite our tools every time users want to use them with a |
9 |
different package manager. |
10 |
|
11 |
Yes, a side effect of not having that is that a lot of tools would need |
12 |
to be rewritten too if we would make a sudden move to pkgcore; or at |
13 |
least, it would mean that Portage would still need to be around to serve |
14 |
as an API, but that would also mean it still needs to be maintained. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
With kind regards, |
18 |
|
19 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
20 |
Gentoo Developer |
21 |
|
22 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
23 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
24 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |