Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: jmbsvicetto@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:50:28
Message-Id: 20110918165133.444159c7@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr by "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:27:02 +0000
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 18-09-2011 12:59, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> > > wrote: > >> No, there isn't anything traumatic. The only thing systemd folks > >> are doing is nicely asking devs to include systemd unit files > >> whenever necessary or use the eclass whenever upstream supplies > >> those files. > >> > >> In other words, some devs just found themselves a scapegoat. > >> > > > > ++ > > > > I'm astonished by the large amount of misinformation that is being > > spread around about systemd. If this originated on the gentoo-user > > mailing list, I'm disappointed that Gentoo users wouldn't do some > > basic research. > > > > I kind of expect this kind of trigger-happy FUD from websites like > > omgubuntu, but surely Gentoo folk are more mature. > > You mean that no Linux users, in particular anyone not running or not > wanting to run GNOME and Fedora, shouldn't be worried about the way > some people in the GNOME and Fedora community seem intent to impose > their ways to everyone else? Worse, in the process seeming to want to > convince everyone they found the panacea and that the "old unix ways" > that have been around for 40+ years are all obsolete and that we > should give in to "the collective"?
Could you give at least a single example instead of this 'blah blah blah, I don't like you'? It's much easier to discuss particular cases rather than 'they all make me feel sad'. -- Best regards, Michał Górny


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature