| 1 |
I just tested gtkmm and galeon on gcc-3.1 and you get a thumbs up |
| 2 |
there. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Do you know the status of Perl with GCC-3.1? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
--Brandon |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Previous Message(s)-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
| 9 |
> I went from a bootstrapped gcc3 profile with gcc3.0.4 to gcc3.1. Some |
| 10 |
> stuff I've seen break so far: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> gtkmm: |
| 13 |
> wouldn't compile without patch. fixed in portage cvs though (unmask |
| 14 |
> x11-libs/gtkmm-1.2.9-r1 and test it for me) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> galeon: |
| 17 |
> similar situation. soon to be fixed in portage cvs (will be 1.2.1-r2 |
| 18 |
> when i commit it shortly -- test that too if you can) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> If some kind volunteers could test these two items with gcc2.95.3, |
| 21 |
> gcc3.0.4 and gcc3.1 and let me or some other dev know if they work for |
| 22 |
> each, we'll unmask them. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Appart from that, I've found you need to re-emerge basically any package |
| 25 |
> who's libs or binaries depend on libstdc++.so.3. (c++-based apps). |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I'll post more stuff to this thread as I find it. And, no... I haven't |
| 28 |
> tried KDE/QT with gcc3.1 yet :) |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Matt |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 17:24, Milos Negovanovic wrote: |
| 33 |
> > when can we expect switch to gcc3?...just curious |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> Matthew Kennedy |
| 37 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 40 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 41 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 42 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives