| 1 |
Well for myself I found compromise. Although in both proposals as I see |
| 2 |
you've omitted part where you'll discuss how you are going to implement |
| 3 |
this feature, implementing this feature as eclass addresses most of my |
| 4 |
concerns, since: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
1. ebuild's syntax does not change |
| 7 |
2. people will have to inherit some.eclass to use them and thus will do |
| 8 |
this only when it's really saves time/efforts |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I've dropped all other answers I was going to give you since I started |
| 11 |
to feel that this is just another cycle. We can discuss them off list if |
| 12 |
necessary. :) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Peter. |
Archives