1 |
> As far as protecting ebuilds goes, I was actually referring to the ability |
2 |
> to mix keywords (i.e. x86 and ~x86) and still upgrade world in an easy |
3 |
> manner. I think there should be two source or ebuild systems, one for the |
4 |
> base system and one for the "ports". In this manner one can keep the |
5 |
> software up to date and yet keep the system stable. I am thinking along the |
6 |
> lines of the freebsd ports system, but with ebuilds instead. |
7 |
|
8 |
Clearly "-U" needs to get fixed, and I know that carpaski has plans to |
9 |
do just that. It's worth noting, though, that one of the great |
10 |
strengths of Gentoo Linux is that there is _no_ separation between |
11 |
"system" and "ports" as there is in the bsd world; all packages are |
12 |
handled on an equal footing. That lack of separation is one of the |
13 |
things that makes Gentoo so useful as a metadistribution -- somebody who |
14 |
needs a custom base profile can easily create one. |
15 |
|
16 |
-g2boojum- |
17 |
-- |
18 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> |