Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Infra plans regarding $Id$ - official answer... | ||
| Date: | Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:59:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_nbCwNn9MawxsA6qy30vRPtd6t7=TO6-8eyqfkVXF5ReA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Infra plans regarding $Id$ - official answer... by "Robin H. Johnson" |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > The intent is that the ONLY place the keywords are expanded, will be in |
| 4 | > the rsync export. FUTURE tense, it's not ready yet. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Will that include any case where the string "$Id$" appears in a patch file? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | That is the main source of problems here. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Really, anytime what the dev tests and commits is different from what |
| 12 | the users see is a potential source of problems. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Infra plans regarding $Id$ - official answer... | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Infra plans regarding $Id$ - official answer... | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |