1 |
Does anyone know why php wont work with apache-2? |
2 |
|
3 |
I thought there were "issues" with particular php routines that you may |
4 |
or may not come across depending on what you are doing, and apache-2 |
5 |
performance in general was slower and was unsatisfactory on high load |
6 |
servers - i.e., at about 6months ago apache-2 just wasnt ready for prime |
7 |
time. Have these problems been overcome, or are they just being |
8 |
ignored? |
9 |
|
10 |
BillK |
11 |
|
12 |
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 23:16, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: |
13 |
> Donny Davies wrote: |
14 |
> > In a perfect world there'd be no issues at all, and this email |
15 |
> > wouldnt be required. Having said that, I encourage you all to |
16 |
> > install Apache2, migrate your configuration and leave Apache1 |
17 |
> > behind. Basically this is your opportunity to provide feedback, |
18 |
> > an advanced warning, as it were. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Hello |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I'd like to say that I wholeheartedly support this move. Having had a |
23 |
> fair share of issues with getting PHP to work with Apache2 resulting |
24 |
> from mistakes that I was making, all is now working perfectly well |
25 |
> thanks to robbat2. Unmasking apache2 will not only eradicate the |
26 |
> somewhat unusual practice of masking for the purpose of being a |
27 |
> development branch and will considerably cut down administrating both |
28 |
> releases and their problem free coexistence. As regarding, conforming |
29 |
> to specifications of other distros as far as I know Gentoo is the first |
30 |
> that I've come across that has made it so very easy to get Apache2 and |
31 |
> PHP working amongst other things. By taking such leaps they not only |
32 |
> set new trends in the market but also provide an exemplary lead to the rest. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Many thanks |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> -- |
38 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
39 |
-- |
40 |
William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |