| 1 |
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:02:10PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote: |
| 2 |
> I suggest not using preempt with XFS for production systems. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ok. Does my desktop count as production :) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Otherwise it's a fine filesystem that works just like the others. I have |
| 7 |
> had little problems with it to date. I have used it in production for over |
| 8 |
> a year. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I've been using it on my Gentoo system since I first installed. I really |
| 11 |
wanted to upgrade to get some of the grsecurity stuff implemented but I also |
| 12 |
wanted to try the preempt patch. I went ahead and hacked the xfs patches |
| 13 |
in. I had to fix about a dozen rejected patches but it was all pretty |
| 14 |
straight forward stuff. If anybody wants a copy from my tree of slightly |
| 15 |
hacked xfs patches that willy apply to their gentoo-sources (which apparently |
| 16 |
may be a bad idea) send me an email. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thanks for the quick responses! |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
john |
Archives