1 |
Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> This looks a lot safer than yesterday's patch since there are no |
4 |
> ebuild removals here. |
5 |
|
6 |
Thank you Mike. |
7 |
|
8 |
> If/when you do want to remove old ebuilds, I suggest creating a github |
9 |
> PR, and let the CI bot check reverse dependencies. |
10 |
|
11 |
Yeah, that would have been a much safer way to remove ebuilds. |
12 |
|
13 |
> This was actually done for the change that was reverted yesterday, but |
14 |
> it seems like the CI results were ignored and the commit was pushed |
15 |
> regardless. |
16 |
|
17 |
Yesterday the original pull requests by Mo did not remove ebuilds. It |
18 |
was only when I started to adopt the PR that I saw |
19 |
|
20 |
> RepoMan scours the neighborhood... |
21 |
> repo.eapi-deprecated 1 |
22 |
> virtual/cblas/cblas-1.0.ebuild: 5 |
23 |
|
24 |
after which I impulsively killed it. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
I should take this lesson and be more careful removing ebuilds. |
28 |
|
29 |
Yours, |
30 |
Benda |