1 |
On Saturday 08 July 2006 02:20, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
2 |
> I also mentioned it in a bugzilla comment, though admittedly not as a |
3 |
> question there. (The gcc 2 bug, I think.) Bugzilla comments are safe to |
4 |
> assume read, right? |
5 |
|
6 |
the gcc2 bug has a lot of things in there i need to review/merge so it's in |
7 |
my "little" TODO box |
8 |
|
9 |
> > like i said in my previous e-mail, forcing stubs onto people even when |
10 |
> > USE=vanilla *is by design* because i got tired of people who had no clue |
11 |
> > about the consequences throwing USE=vanilla into their USE in make.conf |
12 |
> > and then complaining when the lack of SSP broke things ... |
13 |
> |
14 |
> But I'm not asking for USE="vanilla" to disable SSP completely, I'm only |
15 |
> asking for USE="vanilla nossp" to disable it. "nossp" is already |
16 |
> explicitly documented as "NOT FOR GENERAL USE", too. |
17 |
|
18 |
well, vanilla is marked the same way, yet people use it ;) |
19 |
|
20 |
but as i said, i'll add 'use vanilla || apply_stub' logic once 4.1.x goes |
21 |
stable, just no sooner |
22 |
-mike |