| 1 |
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 08:57:45 Thilo Bangert wrote: |
| 2 |
> > , efficient, known-good solution |
| 3 |
> > that does what you'd expect it to do and replace it with a new thingy |
| 4 |
> > that doesn't provide all the features, is harder to debug etc. etc.? I |
| 5 |
> > just don't see any *advantage* from it apart from saying "OMG HAZ NEW |
| 6 |
> > FEATRUES" :) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> one feature of systemd is, that it has an active upstream. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
... and so does openrc |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> no, i dont think it would be a good idea to switch to systemd, just yet. |
| 13 |
> but like the original baselayout was breaking new ground back when it |
| 14 |
> first was developed, so is systemd. it does things differently and may not |
| 15 |
> have all features yet, but from the outset it appears to be vastly |
| 16 |
> superior to sysv-style inits, upstart and openrc. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
nothing is stopping you or anyone else from making systemd work under Gentoo |
| 19 |
-mike |
Archives