1 |
On 11/23/11 3:27 PM, Torsten Veller wrote: |
2 |
> What do you expect to happen with bugs assigned to maintainer-needed? |
3 |
|
4 |
I'm going to CC arches myself after a while, similarly as with bugs with |
5 |
other maintainers who don't respond. |
6 |
|
7 |
> I don't know if any of the packages is really good to be stabilized. |
8 |
> Maybe they are better than the current stable version, maybe not. |
9 |
|
10 |
1. Note that my script only considers packages with no open bugs. |
11 |
|
12 |
2. It's good for stable to be closer to ~arch, because that's what most |
13 |
developers use it seems. It's also quite common for the stable version |
14 |
to contain more bugs that are fixed in a more recent version. |
15 |
|
16 |
3. Arch testing results in... more testing, so filing of such a bug may |
17 |
actually result in real bugs being filed against the package. I think |
18 |
that's good. |
19 |
|
20 |
Paweł |