| 1 |
On Friday 16 September 2005 20:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:42:36 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | Ok, I do think that we will need a way for the maintainer to indicate |
| 6 |
> | that the package is stable. I'd be happy to leave stabilizing out of |
| 7 |
> | my hands, but I wouldn't want my packages to be stabilized before I |
| 8 |
> | deem it stable. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Take it out of package.mask and leave it for thirty (package-dependent) |
| 11 |
> days. If there is a pressing (eg security) reason for it to go to |
| 12 |
> stable sooner than would normally be expected, file a bug and Cc: the |
| 13 |
> relevant arch teams. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I was thinking more like signalling that it shouldn't be stable yet, but |
| 16 |
shouldn't be masked either. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Paul |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 22 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 23 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 24 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives