| 1 |
On 9/20/06, Matthew Marlowe <mattm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> 3) We are where we are at today. Stuart comes up with a great idea for the |
| 3 |
> seeds project which might help address the virtualization address image and |
| 4 |
> it appears releng doesnt like it, so progress could be delayed by another 6 |
| 5 |
> months to year. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I can't claim credit for the idea; plenty of other folks have had the |
| 8 |
same idea, and I'm sure plenty of our users are already doing this for |
| 9 |
themselves in their own way. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Please be assured that Chris's comments today haven't discouraged me |
| 12 |
(or, as best I know, any of the other contributors) from making this |
| 13 |
happen. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I was hoping to avoid having to say this - actually I was hoping to |
| 16 |
avoid this whole drama - but we _don't_ need releng's approval to do |
| 17 |
this. To delay progress, Chris will need to make a formal complaint |
| 18 |
to the Council. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I don't think Chris wants that. Everyone, please give him some credit. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Besides, I'm sure we'll delay our own progress whilst we figure out |
| 23 |
how to make seeds work well ;-) I think folks are getting carried |
| 24 |
away here! Let's get stuff working first, eh? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> Note that I am only bringing this issue up because I thought releng was being |
| 27 |
> unfair to stuart's proposal. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I wouldn't like to assume that Chris is speaking for releng here. I |
| 30 |
think it'd be fairer to assume that this is his personal opinion, |
| 31 |
until something is explicitly said to the contrary. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Best regards, |
| 34 |
Stu |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives