Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 19 -- Gentoo Stable Portage Tree
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:13:13
Message-Id: 200402031108.15333.pauldv@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 19 -- Gentoo Stable Portage Tree by Kurt Lieber
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Monday 02 February 2004 20:53, Kurt Lieber wrote:
5 > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:27:08PM -0600 or thereabouts, Brian Jackson
6 wrote:
7 > > One problem I have with this is that it says all ebuilds should
8 > > remain in the tree for a minimum of one year. 4 releases a year, and
9 > > every package in the tree is going to have 4 versions that can't be
10 > > cleaned out for at least a year. Not to mention that it's going to
11 > > be hard to get developers in to the mindset of saving old ebuilds
12 > > when we've been beating them ruthlessly about keeping portage clean
13 > > for the past 6 months at least. Do you have any ideas about how to
14 > > deal with this?
15 >
16 > Valid point. One suggestion I would have would be to add a "date
17 > created" stamp to each ebuild (or perhaps this information is already
18 > there in the header somewhere). Then, we can track that info across
19 > the whole stable tree so the developer wouldn't have to worry about
20 > it.
21 >
22 > That is to say that, once it makes it into the stable tree, the
23 > developer isn't responsible for ensuring it stays there for a year --
24 > it's up to the maintainers of the stable tree (gentoo-server unless
25 > releng wants the job).
26 >
27 > I also like this solution because it would allow us to do useful
28 > things like publish a schedule of when various ebuilds will be retired
29 > so users can check them ahead of time and plan accordingly.
30
31 I think it should be mainly the responsibility of the administrators of
32 the systems running stable to initiate an update. It is at most 4 times
33 per year, so it shouldn't be a big hurdle. If you would automatically
34 update after 3 months it would lose most of the advantages of having a
35 stable tree in the first place.
36
37 Paul
38
39 - --
40 Paul de Vrieze
41 Gentoo Developer
42 Mail: pauldv@g.o
43 Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
44 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
45 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
46
47 iD8DBQFAH3MObKx5DBjWFdsRAoiQAKDTZJV8Xp4KXpjoBrY20UK5vkzzOQCgvOh8
48 w7ttj+FM1J/myu2zlnfUUyY=
49 =2uy6
50 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
51
52 --
53 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list