1 |
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 07:32 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> I'm also curious as to why people should be expected to assign |
3 |
> copyright to a group that is known for licence violations and removing |
4 |
> attribution from documents. How does this protect anything? |
5 |
|
6 |
Yeah, you cry foul when people paint you with an overly broad brush. Is |
7 |
it known? As far as I remember, the issue was acknowledged when brought |
8 |
up, and then fixed. The issue hasn't come up again with your docs. It |
9 |
hasn't come up with any other thing. So how exactly, is "this group" |
10 |
known for doing these things? Honestly, it doesn't seem like you even |
11 |
read your own mails. It's like you pop a pill and go off into |
12 |
la-la-land where everyone is out to attack you, and the only one allowed |
13 |
to say anything with sweeping generalisations without justifications is |
14 |
you. If anyone said anything remotely in this vein about you or yours, |
15 |
you'd be off on so many tangents, nobody could keep count. And you'd be |
16 |
asking for endless justification after justification of every little |
17 |
syllable. You would actually gain back some respect if you behaved the |
18 |
way you expect everyone else to behave. If you wouldn't want this sort |
19 |
of brush to be used on you, how are you getting off using it yourself? |
20 |
|
21 |
Grow up. |
22 |
|
23 |
Seemant |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |