Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 22:54:24
Message-Id: 1173047576.22278.113.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 07:32 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > I'm also curious as to why people should be expected to assign
3 > copyright to a group that is known for licence violations and removing
4 > attribution from documents. How does this protect anything?
5
6 Yeah, you cry foul when people paint you with an overly broad brush. Is
7 it known? As far as I remember, the issue was acknowledged when brought
8 up, and then fixed. The issue hasn't come up again with your docs. It
9 hasn't come up with any other thing. So how exactly, is "this group"
10 known for doing these things? Honestly, it doesn't seem like you even
11 read your own mails. It's like you pop a pill and go off into
12 la-la-land where everyone is out to attack you, and the only one allowed
13 to say anything with sweeping generalisations without justifications is
14 you. If anyone said anything remotely in this vein about you or yours,
15 you'd be off on so many tangents, nobody could keep count. And you'd be
16 asking for endless justification after justification of every little
17 syllable. You would actually gain back some respect if you behaved the
18 way you expect everyone else to behave. If you wouldn't want this sort
19 of brush to be used on you, how are you getting off using it yourself?
20
21 Grow up.
22
23 Seemant
24
25
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Some council topics for March meeting Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>