Archives
Archives
| From: | Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook | ||
| Date: | Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:27:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | jl9s0r$f3h$1@dough.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook by Walter Dnes |
||
| 1 | Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 | > I've also cobbled together my |
| 3 | > own "autodepclean" script that check for, and optionally unmerges |
| 4 | > unneeded stuff that was pulled in as a dependancy of a package that has |
| 5 | > since been removed. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | What advantage does it have over a standard --depclean? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | #friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |