| 1 |
2011-09-16 01:54:44 Brian Harring napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:21:55AM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: |
| 3 |
> > 2011-09-15 09:55:08 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): |
| 4 |
> > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:35:21 +0200 |
| 5 |
> > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > Could you point me to at least a single program not supporting dots |
| 7 |
> > > > in useflags? My quick check shows that all PMs handle them well, quse |
| 8 |
> > > > and euse as well. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > Hrm, it's rather disappointing that they're accepted everywhere. That |
| 11 |
> > > really shouldn't happen... My excuse for Paludis is that I never quite |
| 12 |
> > > got around to passing in additional flags to validation of names, and |
| 13 |
> > > dots are legal in exheres-0 |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > There is no reason for Gentoo to be worse than Exherbo and not allow dots in USE flags. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Seriously Arfrever, drop the rhetoric here, and go fix the profile |
| 18 |
> compatibility issue. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I suggest to support files with "-${EAPI}" suffix. |
| 21 |
Examples: |
| 22 |
profiles/package.mask-5 |
| 23 |
profiles/use.desc-5 |
| 24 |
profiles/base/package.mask-5 |
| 25 |
profiles/base/package.use-5 |
| 26 |
profiles/base/package.use.force-5 |
| 27 |
profiles/base/package.use.mask-5 |
| 28 |
profiles/base/use.force-5 |
| 29 |
profiles/base/use.mask-5 |
| 30 |
profiles/desc/python_abis.desc-5 |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Archives