| 1 |
On 08/11/2011 12:13 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
| 2 |
> 1. implement the ASAP feature in Entropy and live with broken dependencies |
| 3 |
> 2. live with broken dependencies |
| 4 |
> 3. Fix the broken dependencies |
| 5 |
> 4. Fix the broken dependencies and have PMS defining rules for |
| 6 |
> scheduling PDEPENDs. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It's fair enough for you to call them "broken" dependencies. However, |
| 9 |
when writing "broken" dependencies it what comes natural to ebuild |
| 10 |
developers, is it practical to fight them even though you can write your |
| 11 |
dependency resolver to cope with it? |
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Thanks, |
| 14 |
Zac |
Archives