1 |
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:47 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
2 |
> Matthias Langer <mlangc@×××.at>: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > Well, I don't know what your problem really is about; I'm running x86, |
5 |
> > and if something breaks on my system, it's mostly not because of |
6 |
> > broken packages, but because I should have been informed about |
7 |
> > possible issues that could have been caused by an upgrade, and how to |
8 |
> > avoid them. Often, ebuilds contain very important information that |
9 |
> > are brought to the user via elog, ewarn and friends. The problem with |
10 |
> > this approach is, that I won't read these messages if I'm doing a |
11 |
> > world update while I'm asleep. This is, why I think, that it should |
12 |
> > be one of Gentoos highest priorities to implement Glep 42 and make |
13 |
> > heavy use of it. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Use the ELOG features of Portage. The needed software has been |
16 |
> packaged by your master-dev. :) app-portage/elogviewer in your case... |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
Thanks for that tip - app-portage/elogviewer seems to be an interesting |
20 |
program. However, it is not an alternative for glep 42 as it may not |
21 |
inform me about possible issues *before* it might be almost too late. |
22 |
While for me, searching through the logs, to fix things afterwards is |
23 |
acceptable, it is not on a system where functionality is critical. |
24 |
|
25 |
Matthias |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |