1 |
On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 02:35 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
2 |
> Modifying an existing user is a bad default and makes Gentoo |
3 |
> special because it is common for system administrators to make |
4 |
> modifications to user (i.e. putting an user into another service's |
5 |
> group to allow that user to access service in question) and it |
6 |
> would be unexpected to see these changes reverted during normal |
7 |
> world upgrade (which could break services). |
8 |
|
9 |
Not modifying an existing user is a horrible default that has already |
10 |
bricked one system (by removing /dev/null). So, over my dead commit |
11 |
access. |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Best regards, |
15 |
Michał Górny |