Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps

[Tom Wijsman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1



On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:53:49 -0400

Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote:



> Using ${PVR} to detect how portage should update things
> would be asking for trouble, imo.


This entire sub thread reads like a dynamic dependencies alternative in

disguise, the difference lies in an increase of the level of control

and in the place where this then gets reimplemented.



The increase of control comes from the maintainer being able to decide

whether the dependencies in the vdb are updated or not; however, this

gives rise to a mindset where you consider this level of control for

other variables as well (which syntax we'll [ab]use for that?) as well

as end up with more ebuilds for the sake of updating vdb dependencies.



Using an extension like -rX.Y seems odd; at the very least, I think an

incremental variable or something along that line in the ebuild would

work better. This allows for array usage like VERSION[dependencies]=1,

thus allowing other variables to be dynamic as well; you compare that

number against the one in the vdb, bingo...



Or is it just a figment?



Please think a design through and don't take a cheap shot with -rX.Y.



- -- 

With kind regards,



Tom Wijsman (TomWij)

Gentoo Developer



E-mail address  : TomWij@g.o

GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D

GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v2



iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTzulZAAoJEPWZc8roOL/QzSMH/0wrGF+6joDtUlmUiNuTZBHB

Y0aYkr+Je7R4jj+NQxMY08j+odyImgnT+IrNrQcs7VEboXkrKS0s7ZEmQqCpNvmp

vVLvGUeAlzPgGz31aKIzMBhe5TuyCTwOvArU+DVcxDEktcbHP+sDBPTojQAr932e

qJtf6fdXDaUklu+MPlNofroREd2hjUrkS34ll6W5E+KizNMfRO7n4SAN38pkkE+C

4t3elp1I2Eei7HQT/cNUY78ab8Sgiy6N5CryN73zx6jyw9EwShLFV/8VN3M9SJ1B

jvBmD01EjsW6FLz6fvUPy2dz4GBKaC4YY0qhK5XocBwROUu2yCGV/w/es1JROB0=

=xuKt

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----