1 |
I don't see the point for this reply seeing that Andrew admitted he |
2 |
was in error half-an-hour ago in this very thread. |
3 |
|
4 |
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Ciaran |
5 |
McCreesh<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:08:01 -0400 |
7 |
> Andrew D Kirch <trelane@×××××××.net> wrote: |
8 |
>> I've talked with the pkgcore people and they don't use the EAPI's (or |
9 |
>> PMS) in the first place. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> If that were true, which it isn't, then by Council decision pkgcore |
12 |
> should have been package.masked. |
13 |
> |
14 |
>> This essentially leaves you writing documents you're requiring for |
15 |
>> paludis support. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> No, it leaves me writing documents used by Portage, Pkgcore, Paludis |
18 |
> and at least two more independent under-development third party package |
19 |
> management libraries. |
20 |
> |
21 |
>> As this seems to be mostly a PM issue, it should be taken elsewhere. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> This thread is necessary for Portage support for EAPI 3, which is being |
24 |
> worked on. It also has considerable developer impact, since depending |
25 |
> upon the decisions made, certain existing conventions may no longer |
26 |
> apply to EAPI 3 things. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Given that your stated intention is for "Paludis to fail", and that |
29 |
> "opposing [me] and everything [I] do was an initiative [you] started |
30 |
> only after careful consideration", I'll kindly ask you to stop randomly |
31 |
> jumping out and flinging turds, since it adds nothing to the discussion |
32 |
> at hand and only serves to make it harder for Gentoo to function as a |
33 |
> community. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> -- |
36 |
> Ciaran McCreesh |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |