| 1 |
On Sunday 02 April 2006 04:48, Daniel Goller wrote: |
| 2 |
> exactly, what's the point of removing it so fast? give people a chance |
| 3 |
> to miss it, it does not matter if it's removed or masked only as far as |
| 4 |
> going "woah, what?" and if masked it is a matter of unmasking rather |
| 5 |
> than recommitting |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
We haven't had a single issue with the usual seven day period as far as I can |
| 8 |
remember, so please come up with a valid argument against it, instead |
| 9 |
assuming turning my argument would be one. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> in short, if it's slowing down the process, why do you need it to be |
| 12 |
> quick in the first place? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Getting the junk out of tree and mind as fast as possible is a value in |
| 15 |
itself. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Carsten |
Archives