| 1 |
Am Freitag, 30. März 2007 23:13 schrieb Christopher Sawtell: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 31 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:13:18 +0100 |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:50:59 +0100 |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > > A few years ago Gentoo had some serious advantages over the |
| 10 |
> > > > competition. These days, Gentoo is at serious risk of being Red |
| 11 |
> > > > Queened by Ubuntu and Fedora. Providing the same thing that was |
| 12 |
> > > > provided two years ago isn't enough. If Portage can't deliver |
| 13 |
> > > > functionality that makes Gentoo competitive with where Ubuntu |
| 14 |
> > > > will be a year from now, Portage has to be replaced. |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > You seem to be under the misapprehension that Portage == Gentoo. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > No no, I'm saying that at present Portage is one of Gentoo's most |
| 19 |
> > severe limiting factors. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> In which case your Paludis fork of Gentoo will take off like a |
| 22 |
Please, pretty please with sugar atop: Stop this FUD about forking |
| 23 |
Gentoo. Paludis is not a fork of Gentoo, it's new package manager. The |
| 24 |
relation between Portage and Paludis can, if at all, probably be |
| 25 |
compared to dselect vs apt. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Don't reply to this mail, just let it drop. Thank you very much. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Danny |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 32 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives