1 |
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:40:51 -0700 |
2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On 09/18/2012 12:29 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:25:57 -0700 |
5 |
> > Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> >> Also, if we change the meaning of RDEPEND in the next EAPI, so that |
7 |
> >> it's a hard build-time dep like DEPEND, then DEPEND="${RDEPEND} |
8 |
> >> virtual/pkgconfig" can be reduced to DEPEND="virtual/pkgconfig". |
9 |
> >> This is what I would like to do for the experimental EAPI |
10 |
> >> 5-hdepend which is planned [1]. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > What're we going to do about the zillions of unsolvable cycles that |
13 |
> > that would create? (Does Portage detect those and error out yet?) |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Yeah, it would be treated just like a DEPEND cycle, which is already |
16 |
> detected and treated as a fatal error. As a result, when bumping the |
17 |
> EAPI of an ebuild, you may have to migrate some deps from RDEPEND to |
18 |
> PDEPEND in order to solve the cycles. |
19 |
|
20 |
What about the large number of RDEPENDs that are required for a package |
21 |
to be usable, but not for it to be installed? |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |