Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] integrity of stage files
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 22:44:33
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] integrity of stage files by "Paweł Hajdan
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 02:45:02PM -0700, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> I checked > <> > and the Handbook only mentions validating MD5 checksums. > > There are two possible issues: > > 1. Why are we using _only_ MD5 and SHA1 as the checksums? Shouldn't we > be using something stronger?
Fixed in Catalyst now.;a=commit;h=42b4f6608682cf03954918ecce7923330a1656fe So when the stagebuilders update their Catalyst, they will be generated with newer hashes.
> 2. I noticed the checksums are signed (.asc files). With what key are > they signed? How is that key handled, and how to ensure people use the > right key when verifying the signature?
Documented here: Relevant to this discussion: The weekly builds are signed with: key 2D182910 RSA 4096-bit, generated 2009/08/25 Gentoo Linux Release Engineering (Automated Weekly Release Key) <releng@g.o> It's located in the pipeline that collects stages and isos for publication. The non-weekly releases (eg 11.2) have a separate key key 17072058, DSA 1024-bit, generated 2004/07/20 Gentoo Linux Release Engineering (Gentoo Linux Release Signing Key) <releng@g.o> -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robbat2@g.o GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] integrity of stage files "Paweł Hajdan
Re: [gentoo-dev] integrity of stage files Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>