| 1 |
Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12 April 2010 15:22, Arun Raghavan<ford_prefect@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse<george.prowse@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.prowse@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>> [...] |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>>> If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong. |
| 12 |
>>>>> Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help |
| 13 |
>>>>> Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like |
| 14 |
>>>>> litigation when trying to protect it's logo. |
| 15 |
>>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>> I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if |
| 17 |
>>>> perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light. |
| 18 |
>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>> |
| 20 |
>>> There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>> Which the Wiki team should really be addressing before making a |
| 23 |
>> world-editable wiki. |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
> If you're talking about the offical wiki, we are addressing that |
| 26 |
> problem. If you are talking about the unofficial one, I can only |
| 27 |
> agree. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Cheers, |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Just to add two cents worth. I rarely, very rarely, go to the |
| 33 |
"unofficial" Gentoo wiki. To put it simply, its not supported by the |
| 34 |
Gentoo organization itself. When it comes to my system, I want people |
| 35 |
that I know use Gentoo and understand how it works or that the info is |
| 36 |
from the official Gentoo Docs. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
I may be able to contribute to the official Gentoo wiki when the need |
| 39 |
arises but I doubt I would ever do that on the current unofficial wiki. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Just my two cents worth for the day. Back to my hole. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Dale |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
:-) :-) |
Archives