Re: [gentoo-dev] Documentation licenses and license_groups

[Vincent Launchbury]

Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Shouldn't all licenses listed at <http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/>
> (unless marked as non-free) be added to FSF-APPROVED? These would be
> the following:

Great idea, that would remove a lot of hassle.

Also, I was wondering about LGPL-2 and GPL-1, surely they're
GPL-compatible? The suggested license header in
/usr/portage/licenses/GPL-1 contains "either version 1, or (at your
option) any later version." The LGPL-2 suggests 2 or later also. It's
strange that the FSF doesn't mention them.

Either way, the groups should definitely be expanded.