1 |
On 01/16/2013 01:18 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On 16/01/13 08:32 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote: |
4 |
>>>> On 00:36 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
5 |
>>>>> several people have pointed out to me that the 10.0 -> 13.0 |
6 |
>>>>> transition would be a good moment to finally remove the (also in |
7 |
>>>>> my opinion rather useless) server profiles. |
8 |
>>>>> |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>> The server profiles are not useless, if we can maintain them, and |
11 |
>>>> if they actually are, nowadays, they shouldn't be. |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> -1, unless other profile options being offered are "minimal" enough |
14 |
>>>> for the job and enabling certain things that someone may need in a |
15 |
>>>> server. |
16 |
>>>> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Just to summarize the last massive thread on this: |
19 |
> |
20 |
> 1 - they aren't maintained; they haven't changed for years |
21 |
> |
22 |
>> I think you're confusing updates with maintenance. They work fine as |
23 |
>> is therefore no need for updates. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> 2 - the only difference between server profiles and the base profile |
27 |
> is USE="+snmp" and maybe one other flag |
28 |
> |
29 |
>> USE="-perl -python snmp truetype xml" |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> 3 - there isn't any general consensus on what makes a server, as such |
33 |
> there isn't any consensus on how to make server profiles more useful. |
34 |
> |
35 |
>> Just make the base profile as minimal as possible and people will be happy. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> ... i think that's about it? |
40 |
> |
41 |
> PS: +1 from me. |
42 |
>> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
|
47 |
Agreed on making the base copy as minimal as possible. (which it is, at |
48 |
least good enough for me). |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |