1 |
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 10 February 2013 20:11, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> Otherwise, purpose-driven overlays just make sense - they allow a |
4 |
>> different set of contributors who are more familiar/interested in a |
5 |
>> set of packages to maintain them. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> It makes more sense to let those people be proxy-maintainers and keep |
8 |
> those packages in the main tree. |
9 |
|
10 |
I'm all for that, but until the barriers to that become lower than the |
11 |
barriers to just creating your own overlay, there will always be |
12 |
overlays that contain stuff better maintained that the corresponding |
13 |
stuff in the main tree. |
14 |
|
15 |
I fully support anything that will make proxy-maintenance easier. |
16 |
|
17 |
Rich |