1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> See, if libfoo-1.0's headers don't need (say) boost, but libfoo-1.1's |
3 |
> headers do, with what you're proposing you'd have to go through and |
4 |
> update the dependencies of every single package using libfoo. |
5 |
|
6 |
That's true, and it's why I brought up the cascading DEPEND bit in the |
7 |
original e-mail. |
8 |
|
9 |
If we decide that a new dependency atom is what we need, I'd rather have |
10 |
the temporary solution be one that people have some motivation to |
11 |
change. Otherwise it won't be temporary, it'll just sit there and rot |
12 |
forever. |
13 |
|
14 |
Thanks, |
15 |
Donnie |
16 |
-- |
17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |