| 1 |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 1:31 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Again, I don't understand why you continue escalating this. I have |
| 3 |
> already indicated that I'm fine with adding an option to disable this, |
| 4 |
> given that 1) the current behavior remains the default, and 2) people |
| 5 |
> are given big fat warning that they are now responsible for updating |
| 6 |
> their users (and ideally 3) the eclass tells user how to update |
| 7 |
> the user). I've just asked for the option to override values via |
| 8 |
> make.conf goes first since that is the preferred solution that doesn't |
| 9 |
> destroy the foundations of GLEP 81. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> floppym has indicated an interest in this, so I've presumed he's going |
| 12 |
> to submit an updated patch to the ml. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Sorry, I didn't mean to give that impression. I do not have any plans |
| 15 |
to submit patches myself. I asked if you would accept a similar patch |
| 16 |
to clarify your position for others (including Whissi) who may want to |
| 17 |
contribute. |
Archives