Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning up forcing of all autotools
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:05:27
Message-Id: 200609141302.58094@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] cleaning up forcing of all autotools by Mike Frysinger
1 On Thursday 14 September 2006 05:18, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > i'm going to be fixing the autoconf/automake wrappers so that they no
3 > longer require all versions of autoconf/automake ... this will resolve the
4 > annoying circular dependency but at the sametime packages need to make sure
5 > that if they use autotools, they pull in the correct version
6 On this note, please try to force automake 1.9 if it's possible, as that's
7 safer with autoconf 2.60 (a part the lots of warnings about datarootdir, I've
8 found a couple of packages that fails to compile when built with autoconf
9 2.60 and automake < 1.9).
10
11 This way you also use the latest available without requiring old versions of
12 automake.
13
14 Note that autotools eclass right now simply requires latest version of both
15 automake and autoconf (as it needs autoconf 2.5 series anyway).
16
17 Mike, will you update autotools eclass as well, to accept WANT_AUTO* before
18 inherit line? It should be trivial, but I'd have to check it first.
19
20 --
21 Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
22 Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning up forcing of all autotools Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>