| 1 |
On 11/19/2012 02:40 PM, Greg KH wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 05:35:22PM +0100, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: |
| 3 |
>> El 18/11/12 04:39, Greg KH escribió: |
| 4 |
>>> Anyway, I now see a _very_ dangerous commit in the "Copyright" branch |
| 5 |
>>> that better not get merged into the tree, as it's wrong, and illegal |
| 6 |
>>> under all countries that follow the "normal" body of Copyright Law. It |
| 7 |
>>> should be removed right now before someone gets into trouble, not the |
| 8 |
>>> least of which would be the orginization that the copyright is now being |
| 9 |
>>> attributed to. |
| 10 |
>> So I made a mistake coming out from a missunderstanding on a commit on a |
| 11 |
>> branch that didn't even get merged since I was expecting approval from |
| 12 |
>> somebody else before that. Cool. The amount of damage caused by this |
| 13 |
>> action is around the same as publishing a patch and not applying it. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Not really, having it in the repo worried a lot of people, as it was not |
| 16 |
> an acceptable thing to do. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Would you elaborate on who these people are? |
Archives