| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 20/09/12 03:31 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I don't expect we would be modifying older EAPIs , any usage of IUSE |
| 8 |
etc within phase functions for those EAPIs would remain undefined imo; |
| 9 |
the audit is just to determine what portage (optionally other PMs) |
| 10 |
actually do now, to see what can be relied upon so usage of IUSE etc |
| 11 |
within phase functions in EAPI6 (or an updated EAPI5, maybe) can be |
| 12 |
explicitly stated, without requiring a PM implementation change. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 17 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlBbcswACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDIoQD9E9iZsoqketEInGC9RUoJdPsR |
| 20 |
q286dxqREkQfZHNvQtAA/3V2fm8Uj0w60GfnFCLRqU7Y3dmLoatyBw0fzqhi/s/B |
| 21 |
=XUdp |
| 22 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives