| 1 |
On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 21:22 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
> Btw.: Why the "glx" use flag, and not reusing the already existing and widely |
| 3 |
> used "opengl" flag? Even unexperienced users may have an idea about opengl, |
| 4 |
> but not glx. The "xfs" flag is bad chosen, since it is already used for |
| 5 |
> sys-fs/xfs and everything else than self-describing (e.g. "font-server" would |
| 6 |
> be a better one). The descriptions in profiles/use.local.desc are missing, |
| 7 |
> too. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
A lot of people are having trouble figuring out that 6.8.0-r2 is in |
| 10 |
package.mask, with a line saying it's in development. That's all I'm |
| 11 |
going to say on the subject. |
Archives