Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed security policy for web-based apps
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:02:25
Message-Id: 1120985864.6108.127.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed security policy for web-based apps by Lance Albertson
1 On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:40 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
2 > Yeah, having it in metadata.xml would make more sense.
3
4 We can do that.
5
6 It'd perhaps make sense to extend the DTD for metadata.xml, so that the
7 <maintainer> tag has 'type' and 'organisation' attributes. This would
8 allow tools to tell the difference between an entry for a Gentoo
9 maintainer, and an entry for an upstream maintainer.
10
11 Best regards,
12 Stu
13 --
14 Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o
15 Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
16 http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
17
18 GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
19 Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
20 --

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed security policy for web-based apps Andrej Kacian <ticho@g.o>