| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 03:00 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> considering his initial points: |
| 6 |
> (1) admin is bottleneck |
| 7 |
There's a few hours delay from when key is uploaded to dev to when it's copied |
| 8 |
to cvs anyway... Besides, considering the admin need to create the account in |
| 9 |
the first place, this isn't really an issue. Existing devs can have keys |
| 10 |
uploaded before passwords are disabled. |
| 11 |
> (2) verifying the key wasnt messed with in transit |
| 12 |
> your solution really doesnt address either ... in fact the irc thing is a |
| 13 |
> *really bad* idea ... |
| 14 |
> after all, dcc/irc is as easy to manipulate as telnet (well even easier :D) |
| 15 |
Bug freenode to support GPG authentication for registered nicknames? =p |
| 16 |
- -- |
| 17 |
Luke-Jr |
| 18 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 19 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQE/zAcPZl/BHdU+lYMRAlhqAJ43z8FibiOGBnqWjuUiz+pcS5dcHwCgnAJc |
| 24 |
pxpjdfYzSnZYtGIuGW0XHYs= |
| 25 |
=rPhR |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives