| 1 |
Am Mittwoch 06 Juni 2007 17:53 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:44:49 -0500 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Steev Klimaszewski <steev@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Or... perhaps when asked not to respond to a thread for 24 hours, you |
| 6 |
> > could keep your fucking trap shut? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> If I'm asked by someone with a good reason, sure. If I'm told to by |
| 9 |
> someone on a power trip with a history of abusing authority who's making |
| 10 |
> insane claims about humour not being allowed and trying to achieve a |
| 11 |
> particular outcome to a discussion by censoring anyone who disagrees |
| 12 |
> with them, then no. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
First: |
| 15 |
Avoiding a flame war, and shutting it down as soon as it can clearly be seen |
| 16 |
it will become one, is a very good reason to most of us, i suppose. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Second: |
| 19 |
Noone clamed humor would not be allowed. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Third: |
| 22 |
There was no cencorship. There was a forced delay, after which anyone would |
| 23 |
have been free to spread his/her ideas again. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Last: |
| 26 |
Just stop claiming others are insane, abusive power-trippers just because you |
| 27 |
did not abide by a rule and got your punishment for it. If you dont like the |
| 28 |
way things are, show well-reasons options out of the situation, write an |
| 29 |
eMail to the user-relations or the Council expressing your problem. |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives