| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thursday 17 October 2002 17:38, Randy Dees wrote: |
| 5 |
> This looks like I must be making things harder than they are. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> RTFM is fine, just please point me to the right section of the appropriate |
| 8 |
> FM. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm trying to add the foomatic ebuild from bugs.gentoo.org to my local |
| 11 |
> portage tree. I have paid attention the last few times I emerged portage |
| 12 |
> and am using PORTDIR_OVERLAY with portage 2.0.40. I've created |
| 13 |
> ${PORTDIR_OVERLAY}/net-print/foomatic/ and copied |
| 14 |
> foomatic-2.0-current.ebuild into that directory. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> emerge foomatic gives me: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> saruman local.portage # emerge foomatic |
| 19 |
> Calculating dependencies portage: visible(): None is an invalid |
| 20 |
> cat/pkg-v string. Aborting processing. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I think the 2.0-current version part confuses portage. Read the part about the |
| 23 |
ebuild naming scheme from developer doc, I got this as well with a -pre |
| 24 |
(changed it to _pre and it worked) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
bye, |
| 27 |
Wilbert |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
- -- |
| 30 |
Wilbert Berendsen (http://www.xs4all.nl/~wbsoft/) |
| 31 |
To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion. |
| 32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
iD8DBQE9rzpjx+vk367Vl7wRAm9yAJ4ntTDlbx1HrNMDdrtYj7gsXiJ3vgCgkgPD |
| 36 |
SVQzM6PDJaWNp+qxiBX/Tvc= |
| 37 |
=yOMh |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives