Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog g
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:15:49
Message-Id: CAEdQ38Hx3qEQGXgTZmZCiukbvTMQ0TEx3zU3-=7Wd4uP6Ed++Q@mail.gmail.com
1 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:00:52 -0500 as excerpted:
3 >
4 >> On Wednesday 18 January 2012 21:42:14 Michael Weber wrote:
5 >>> Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds?
6 >>
7 >> take a chill pill phil
8 >>
9 >>> I see a violation of this rule at least on [glibc-]2.13-r4, which
10 >>> leads to useless rebuilds on `emerge -avuND world` on every single
11 >>> gentoo install world-wide.
12 >>
13 >> i don't have too much compassion for -N.  if people really care enough
14 >> about it, they'd read the ChangeLog and see that it is meaningless.
15 >
16 > Considering glibc was just one of some 200-ish packages I rebuilt early
17 > today due to -N, most of the rest being kde-4.7.97 (aka 4.8-rc2) which
18 > will be in-overlay for just a few more days as 4.8-release is due next
19 > week, because gentoo/kde just removed the long-masked kdeenablefinal USE
20 > flag, which because it was masked (and I didn't unmask it) did NOT affect
21 > my kde as installed so I basically did the rebuild for nothing...
22
23 Paragraphs like these are why I have such a hard time reading your
24 entire emails. :P