From: | Ali Polatel <hawking@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Gentoo Developers <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-auth/pam_chroot: ChangeLog pam_chroot-0.9.2.ebuild | ||
Date: | Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:31:01 | ||
Message-Id: | 20071001081901.GA23650@mars | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-auth/pam_chroot: ChangeLog pam_chroot-0.9.2.ebuild by Donnie Berkholz |
1 | Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:06:42AM -0700 tarihinde, Donnie Berkholz yazmış: |
2 | > On 07:46 Mon 01 Oct , Ali Polatel (hawking) wrote: |
3 | > > 1.1 sys-auth/pam_chroot/pam_chroot-0.9.2.ebuild |
4 | > > |
5 | > > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-auth/pam_chroot/pam_chroot-0.9.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup |
6 | > > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-auth/pam_chroot/pam_chroot-0.9.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain |
7 | > |
8 | > > LDFLAGS="$(raw-ldflags)" emake \ |
9 | > > CC="$(tc-getCC)" LD="$(tc-getLD)" || die "emake failed" |
10 | > |
11 | > This reads really strangely to me. It's passing variables on both sides |
12 | > of emake. Generally one would just pick a side (afterwards) and add |
13 | > everything there. |
14 | |
15 | Well, here is the related part from Makefile: |
16 | |
17 | LDFLAGS := -x --shared $(LDFLAGS) |
18 | |
19 | emake LDFLAGS="$(raw-ldflags)" overrides that definition, |
20 | emake LDFLAGS="-x --shared $(raw-ldflags)" works as expected, or my |
21 | version, maybe I should add a note about it to the ebuild... |
22 | |
23 | > Thanks, |
24 | > Donnie |
25 | |
26 | -- |
27 | ali polatel (hawking) |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-auth/pam_chroot: ChangeLog pam_chroot-0.9.2.ebuild | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |