| 1 |
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Arun Raghavan <arunisgod@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 3 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> [...] |
| 5 |
>> That's not how it works. We've seen plenty of times in the past |
| 6 |
>> that forcing QA by making users' systems break (which is how far these |
| 7 |
>> things get before they're fixed) just leads to lots of annoyed users. |
| 8 |
>> EAPI, plus slowly moving things towards new EAPIs on version bumps once |
| 9 |
>> newer EAPIs are widely supported, is the clean way of doing this. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> This might be the clean way to do it, but the unfortunate truth is |
| 12 |
> that new EAPIs seem to be becoming "standard" pretty darn slowly, and |
| 13 |
> counting on one to implement a feature that is definitely very useful |
| 14 |
> for QA seems to be miring ourselves in unnecessary bureaucracy. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
(Replying to a random snippet) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
There has been previous discussion on |
| 19 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138792 |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Santiago M. Mola |
| 24 |
Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives