| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> So you mention openrc, but don't have it on the list? |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yes because openrc isn't really gentoo-specific. I don't want the list |
| 6 |
blowing out to include ever package in the entire tree. ie. Thanking gcc for |
| 7 |
contributing to gentoo. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Note this doesn't mean that openrc won't be on the list. I think that in this |
| 10 |
case the dev has worked closely enough with gentoo to deserve acknowledgment. |
| 11 |
(being a former dev might have helped that :) ) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Maybe it will be in a "Non-Gentoo specific" section of the list, or something. |
| 14 |
My point at the moment is to distinguish it from something like |
| 15 |
pkgcore/paludis which were developed with gentoo firmly as the target platform. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> FWIW, I've not looked, but I think a number of the portage helpers are |
| 18 |
> non-gentoo-dev developed, and certainly a number previously were, that |
| 19 |
> have ultimately been folded back into portage and/or gentoolkit in someway |
| 20 |
> or another now. I'm sure someone from one of those projects can list |
| 21 |
> several of them without even looking. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Well i'm more interested in what is being developed verses what were |
| 24 |
developed. But that is an interesting possibility, not surprising but |
| 25 |
interesting none the less. |
Archives