| 1 |
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 2 |
> > This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0 attribute - for |
| 3 |
> > some of the packages that I maintain, I do not want the bugs assigned |
| 4 |
> > directly to me, but to the herd instead. While for others I _do_ want |
| 5 |
> > the duplicate. |
| 6 |
> Could "contact" be named differently then? |
| 7 |
'autocontact' then? |
| 8 |
Both 'assign' and 'cc' (and derivations thereof are not suitable). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> I do have some reservations due to no human looking over new bugs |
| 11 |
> (before they get reassigned to a possibly otherwise busy maintainer), as |
| 12 |
> someone already has expressed, but we can always try it out and see how |
| 13 |
> it goes, I think. |
| 14 |
This happens already, simply observe the bugs that pile up for |
| 15 |
understaffed herds, or developers that are AWOL. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member |
| 20 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 21 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives