Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:44:08
Message-Id: 20090312184357.GA17640@comet
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On 22:53 Mon 09 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:39:41 -0700
3 > Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
4 > > > * Calling unpack on an unrecognised extension should be fatal,
5 > > > unless --if-compressed is specified. The default src_unpack needs
6 > > > to use this.
7 > >
8 > > Why?
9 >
10 > Currently, if a package does an explicit 'unpack foo.bar', where .bar is
11 > an unsupported archive format, unpack just does nothing. This isn't a
12 > good default behaviour; if a package really wants something to be
13 > ignored silently, it should have to say so.
14
15 I like it when unpack ${A} works regardless of what's in SRC_URI,
16 especially if it's an uncompressed file rather than an unsupported
17 compression format.
18
19 --
20 Thanks,
21 Donnie
22
23 Donnie Berkholz
24 Developer, Gentoo Linux
25 Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>