| 1 |
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:34:35AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> Honestly, we call everyone with an @gentoo.org address a developer, |
| 3 |
> whether they are a "developer" (CVS access) or not. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
There have been heavy objections against that when we presented the |
| 6 |
first draft of the glep using the term developer, even though we |
| 7 |
stated not needing CVS access - so we chose the term staff. |
| 8 |
Tbh, i don't care at all if it's called staff or developer, just make |
| 9 |
it an official member. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
About the status of the forums and being official or not: |
| 12 |
Remember the mess with stats.gentoo.org? The people working on it |
| 13 |
wanted to use this domain and therefor it was suggested that they |
| 14 |
needed to be developers. Please don't get me wrong and this is |
| 15 |
definitely no attemt to revive that discussion, but if |
| 16 |
stats.gentoo.org is official and needs official members, the forums |
| 17 |
should be considered and have official members, too (called staff |
| 18 |
or developers or forums-monkeys). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Anyway, the intention of the GLEP is to solve this problem and not to |
| 21 |
turn gentoo-dev into a flamefest. ;-) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
cheers, |
| 24 |
Wernfried |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Fppmpppffpppmpfpffmffmppmpm Mfpmmmmmmfmm |
| 28 |
fpp.mfpmmmmmmfmm@×××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.mmmfmp |
| 29 |
mfpfmpfmppfm://fpfppffpmmpppff.ppmfmfmpm.mmmfmp/~mmmppmpppmpppppmffppfppp/ |
| 30 |
http://www.namesuppressed.com/kenny/ |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives